Verification Methodology

Recorded signal performance · Canonical accounting

Two accounting views answer different questions

KriptoFarsi distinguishes between two ways of examining the historical signal record.

Canonical signal-lifecycle accounting shows how each signal was resolved under the platform's recorded events, statuses, and fixed outcome rules.

Directional return from the recorded exit price asks what the price movement from entry to that same recorded exit would represent after applying the signal direction.

In the reviewed frozen cohort of 530 signals, before modeled costs, the equal-weight return sum was +279.66% under canonical lifecycle accounting and +26.22% under the stored-price signed-return research view.

The difference does not mean that records were deleted, fabricated, or corrupted. The two methods answer different questions, and neither by itself proves a user's realized account return or independently verified exchange execution.

These figures are equal-weight return sums, not portfolio growth, audited account P&L, or verified subscriber execution.

Cost scenario

Under the modeled base-cost scenario, the corresponding results were +120.47% and −132.97%. These costs are research assumptions, not a reconstruction of actual subscriber trades.

Technical explanation of protected-stop accounting

The canonical convention records protected-stop outcomes as positive lifecycle results. Recalculating the same 180 records using directional signed returns produces an aggregate result 253.44 percentage points lower.

A protected-stop label indicates that risk was reduced after a target was reached. The recorded exit price can nevertheless represent a negative directional return relative to the original entry. Lifecycle status and directional economic return must therefore not be treated as the same concept.

Frozen source: PR #212 · snapshot 2026-07-11

          Signals analysed
          Any proof
          Overall coverage
          Checksum coverage